Elrond disse:Expliquem-me so uma coisa...esse ubber mega sempron 3400+....da tareia num 3000+ 754?
è q o meu tem 1.8Ghz de origem, 512kb de L2 e single channel....é tem PR 3000+...por quantas cargas de agua é q um 1.8Ghz com metade da cache e dual channel tem + 400 de PR?
WE ALL expected that AMD planned to support DDR 2 400, 533 and 667 but very few of us expected that the firm plans to include DDR 2 800 MHz on its list. Before February, the plan was to support all memories up to DDR 667 but AMD eventually decided that it can and will support DDR 2 800 MHz from the outset. Now the migration to DDR 2 finally makes sense, as DDR 2 800 MHz can sure show sume difference compared with DDR 1 400 or even DDR 1 overclocked to 667.
SO, WHAT IS AMD going to do to counter the upcoming Conroe based XEs, not to mention Kentsfield? Well, the obvious answer is the FX62, and that will be no slouch.
What do you do when it is not enough? Cache.
The next gen of AMD FX chips will have the full 'big cache' Opteron level of L3 cache, most likely 4MB. Until software becomes much more threaded than it is now, this will be more than enough to keep up with the competition, or at least keep things credible. For the first time, the line will be more than a plus one bin and no hard multiplier lock. AMD may wait until it sees competition before unleashing this, but it will happen sooner rather than later
blastarr disse:Dual-Core 3800+ de 35W para desktops (!)
destr0yer disse:
Teremos bestas de OC Aquele 4400+ promete
@ god_lx: acho que esta imagem ficava bem numa certa thread da *****
God_Lx disse:Parece-me bem, eu sempre quis um Dual-core a 3400Mhz a ar pro dia a dia...
Dialmedia disse:Um Dual-Core a gastar tanto que um Single Sempron? Hummm... Que tecnologia usarão para conseguirem tamanha proeza?
Cumps.