Yup, confirmo. O google anda mal prós lados do sapo:
C:\>ping
www.google.com -t
Pinging
www.l.google.com [66.249.93.99] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=83ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=245
Reply from 66.249.93.99: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=245
Ping statistics for 66.249.93.99:
Packets: Sent = 31, Received = 31, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 56ms, Maximum = 121ms, Average = 62ms
Mas não deve ser esta a razão para o forum dar os erros de server is full, ou será?