Crazy Inside
Folding Member
anandtech disse:
Pois vamos ver como s vai comportar a DFI
DFI LAN Party CFX3200 DR
- Autor do tópico mascarilha
- Data Início
Pois vamos ver como s vai comportar a DFI
Crazy Inside
Folding Member
Qndo é k começamos a ver testes disso?! Abraço Crazy Inside
Zarolho
Power Member
Muito brevemente, vai depender do tempo disponivel durante o fim-de-semana. Para já, está a trabalhar 100% em default/auto sem qualquer problema desde o 1º boot. O que para mim de certo modo é uma supresa dado que na net tenho visto bastante pessoal com alguns problemas (uns mais do que outros) com a bios que vem com a board.Crazy Inside disse:
Abraço Crazy Inside
Passo seguinte vai ser upgrade da bios e mudar os settings CPU/Ram manualmente.
Zarolho
Power Member
«...he (Tony) works for OCZ - as if he hasnt got the best ram ever...»
«...exactly you have to be careful of guys like me, Tony, Rgone, Fugger, etc
guys like us have inside knowledge, and we have cream-of-the-crop hardware...not necessarily hand-picked cherry...but we have enough of it to choose the best from, and we have hardcore experience with the stuff we have to know exactly what and what it won't do...
guys like Tony, who not only work for one of the best memory mfg's in the world, but is also trained as an engineer and writes bioses in his spare time...and is close to Oskar...you need to realize that there are only a few (count on both hands or maybe hands and feet) guys that are as skilled as Tony.
now...this doesn't mean that no one could ever match Tony or any of our settings...that isn't what I am saying. I am just saying think realistically, and realize there is variation in cpu, memory, motherboard, and skills.
Then, lets be even MORE realistic
and realize
that 300FSB has been pretty simple to achieve since NF3 250Gb...as long as you had the right cpu and the right memory, just about any DFI Lanparty board has been able to hit 300FSB...
what you are not realizing is that 300FSB is not hard with the right memory and cpu memory controller...but the maxed out overclocks and the ability to be 100% stable for long periods of time, without your board breaking down or your cpu breaking down, utilizing the lowest timings and lowest voltages etc...that is what is important.
Not 300FSB. We've seen time and time again that 300x9 still gets beat by 275x10 and 280x10 etc because cpu mhz is what is important when it comes to real applications and games.
What I am hoping for though, is that Tony has the ability to creat a bios that will allow ANYONE to hit 300FSB. Because if he can create a bios and just about anyone can max their overclock with ease, then a previous poster (raju) would be correct...that the board does have a lot of polish, and with a great bios it will have a tremendous amount of SHINE.
Remember Tony's BIOS for the original Lanparty NF4?
Oskar's bioses were good, and opened up a lot of paths for us overclockers to hit our goals, but the 7/04-2BT and BTA were the ones that most of us use, and we've continued to use Tony's tweaked bioses ever since.
I've yet to even begin overclocking this board, but as you all know, overclocking is something I am good at but I always leave until last as I feel if a board cannot perform rock solid at stock speed, then it will be utterly useless at overclocked anything (because it won't be overclocking much if it can't run stable at stock).
Plus I am waiting on a nice, more mature bios...just like most of you
no one seemed to complain much when I said these very same things about Nvidia and SLI, nor about the first RDX200 ATI board...I still am wondering why such a big deal now lol...»
http://www.dfi-street.com/forum/showpost.php?p=466391&postcount=268
«...exactly you have to be careful of guys like me, Tony, Rgone, Fugger, etc
guys like us have inside knowledge, and we have cream-of-the-crop hardware...not necessarily hand-picked cherry...but we have enough of it to choose the best from, and we have hardcore experience with the stuff we have to know exactly what and what it won't do...
guys like Tony, who not only work for one of the best memory mfg's in the world, but is also trained as an engineer and writes bioses in his spare time...and is close to Oskar...you need to realize that there are only a few (count on both hands or maybe hands and feet) guys that are as skilled as Tony.
now...this doesn't mean that no one could ever match Tony or any of our settings...that isn't what I am saying. I am just saying think realistically, and realize there is variation in cpu, memory, motherboard, and skills.
Then, lets be even MORE realistic
and realize
that 300FSB has been pretty simple to achieve since NF3 250Gb...as long as you had the right cpu and the right memory, just about any DFI Lanparty board has been able to hit 300FSB...
what you are not realizing is that 300FSB is not hard with the right memory and cpu memory controller...but the maxed out overclocks and the ability to be 100% stable for long periods of time, without your board breaking down or your cpu breaking down, utilizing the lowest timings and lowest voltages etc...that is what is important.
Not 300FSB. We've seen time and time again that 300x9 still gets beat by 275x10 and 280x10 etc because cpu mhz is what is important when it comes to real applications and games.
What I am hoping for though, is that Tony has the ability to creat a bios that will allow ANYONE to hit 300FSB. Because if he can create a bios and just about anyone can max their overclock with ease, then a previous poster (raju) would be correct...that the board does have a lot of polish, and with a great bios it will have a tremendous amount of SHINE.
Remember Tony's BIOS for the original Lanparty NF4?
Oskar's bioses were good, and opened up a lot of paths for us overclockers to hit our goals, but the 7/04-2BT and BTA were the ones that most of us use, and we've continued to use Tony's tweaked bioses ever since.
I've yet to even begin overclocking this board, but as you all know, overclocking is something I am good at but I always leave until last as I feel if a board cannot perform rock solid at stock speed, then it will be utterly useless at overclocked anything (because it won't be overclocking much if it can't run stable at stock).
Plus I am waiting on a nice, more mature bios...just like most of you
no one seemed to complain much when I said these very same things about Nvidia and SLI, nor about the first RDX200 ATI board...I still am wondering why such a big deal now lol...»
http://www.dfi-street.com/forum/showpost.php?p=466391&postcount=268
DJ_PAPA
Power Member
So uma pequena curiosidade:
Intel Still Has the Largest Chipset Market Share – Research Firm.
ATI Leaves Nvidia, SiS Behind in Chipset Shipments
Pois é, o fabricante numero 3 de momento é ja a ATI que se estreou no mercado há cerca de 2 anos e ja ultrapassou em cota de mercado a Nvidia e a SIS.
Sim, isto quer dizer que sao mais vendidos Xpress200 que Nforce.
E com uma taxa de crescimento de quase 500% ao ano os numeros vao continuar a alargar....
Olhando para os numeros da Intel comparados com os da AMD rapidamente se vê que a Intel tem quase 4x + mercado que a AMD.
Intel Still Has the Largest Chipset Market Share – Research Firm.
ATI Leaves Nvidia, SiS Behind in Chipset Shipments
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/chipsets/display/20060425141244.html
Pois é, o fabricante numero 3 de momento é ja a ATI que se estreou no mercado há cerca de 2 anos e ja ultrapassou em cota de mercado a Nvidia e a SIS.
Sim, isto quer dizer que sao mais vendidos Xpress200 que Nforce.
E com uma taxa de crescimento de quase 500% ao ano os numeros vao continuar a alargar....
Olhando para os numeros da Intel comparados com os da AMD rapidamente se vê que a Intel tem quase 4x + mercado que a AMD.
DJ_PAPA
Power Member
gryle disse:
Essas sao as contas da Mercury Research. Normalmente sao eles que lançam estes numeros quer de graficas, boards, etc etc
Sim, as vendas dos Nforce4 para Intel sao residuais. Um pequeno falhanço digamos.....
Nao sei destas percentagens quais eram crossfire ou nao, mas com este crescimento de vendas rapidamente vao apanhar cota de mercado. 485.7% ao ano é fenomenal....
DJ_PAPA
Power Member
LOL
pequenissimo promenor:
2ºQ 2006? Alguem tem uma maquina do tempo.
Temos o Blastarr a contrariar os dados da Mercury Resherch. So faltava mesmo isto
Por favor por mais que contraries sao os dados do Q1 2006 oficiais e reais. Os dados sao os que sao e por favor nao deturpes o que é mostrado.
pequenissimo promenor:
2ºQ 2006? Alguem tem uma maquina do tempo.
Temos o Blastarr a contrariar os dados da Mercury Resherch. So faltava mesmo isto
Por favor por mais que contraries sao os dados do Q1 2006 oficiais e reais. Os dados sao os que sao e por favor nao deturpes o que é mostrado.
blastarr
Power Member
DJ_PAPA disse:
Deturpar ?
Então aceitas os nºs do Q4, mas não aceitas as forecasts do Q2...
Deves pensar que eles inventam os nºs e tiram-nos da cartola, para enganar os clientes...
Mercury Research, Goldman Sachs, são empresas pequenas e que nada sabem do ramo, certo ? LOLOLOL
DJ_PAPA
Power Member
Claro:blastarr disse:
Intel Still Has the Largest Chipset Market Share – Research Firm.
ATI Leaves Nvidia, SiS Behind in Chipset Shipments
Sei que isto é certo. Mais que isto é entrar em especulação.
Forecast fica pra Maia. (btw caso nao saibas a ATI ja assinou novos contratos com a Intel, por isso a mama esta para durar.....)
