Boas notícias, MSRP 250$. Imagino que por cá vai andar por entre 40-60€ menos que o 5800x3d.Se for menos 10-20€ que o 5800x3D, não.
Pena limitarem a gpu ao 780m, se lançassem um 790m com 18/24 CU com umas boas memórias ficava um brinquedo interessante.
Nem me tinha apercebido que o preço do 5800x3D tinha subido. Eu comprei-o há uns meses por 310€ pelo que ia dizer que mais valia ir para este. Estando mais caro efetivamente o 5700x3D é capaz de ser bem apetecível...O Ryzen 7 5700X3D é CPU para andar por portugal a 299€. Se assim for, é capaz de ser um dos CPUs mais vendidos da gama em 2024.
https://www.techpowerup.com/317694/asrock-launches-amd-fp6-series-thin-mini-itx-motherboardASRock FP6TM-ITX is powered by AMD 7 nm FP6 series mobile processors, providing immersive computing power. It supports two DDR4 memory, four storage slots including two SATA ports and two M.2 slots for expandability. FP6TM-ITX has rich connectivity and provides customized options of rear IO such as one USB Type-C, two DisplayPort to enlarge the flexibility. Moreover, the FP6TM-ITX also offers the version equipped with DASH LAN and TPM functionality tailored for enterprise applications.
Já vem um pouco tarde, mas...
ASRock Launches AMD FP6 Series Thin Mini-ITX Motherboard
https://www.techpowerup.com/317694/asrock-launches-amd-fp6-series-thin-mini-itx-motherboard
AMD recommends pairing Ryzen 8000G APUs with dual-channel DDR5-6000 memory
Maximize performance
https://www.techspot.com/news/101505-amd-recommends-pairing-ryzen-8000g-apus-dual-channel.html
When taking the geo mean of all 151 benchmarks conducted across the Naples and Siena processors on Ubuntu 23.10 + Linux 6.6, the difference becomes extremely clear. The EPYC 8324PN NEBS-friendly model at the same 32-cores / 64-threads of the EPYC 7601 was at 2.05x from that original AMD EPYC server processor. Or going to the AMD EPYC 8534P was 2.34x the performance of the EPYC 7601, again at the same core/thread count.
When looking at the CPU power consumption over the entire span of benchmarks conducted, the Zen 4C processors really stand out... The EPYC 7601 on average was consuming 143 Watts while the EPYC 8324P was at an 88 Watt average and the EPYC 8342PN at a 71 Watt average. The CPUs were staying below their default TDPs with all of the PowerCap/RAPL monitoring.
It's also worth reiterating the idle difference during the brief periods of downtime between benchmarks... The Siena processors could dip down to just 6~11 Watts compared to Naples that had a minimum power draw of 33 Watts but typically was consuming at least 60 Watts.
https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-zen1-zen4cThe change in AMD EPYC performance and power efficiency from Zen 1 to Zen 4C is outstanding. If you are still on an AMD EPYC 7601 series platform it's really time for an upgrade.
The AMD EPYC 8004 series continue to prove themselves very capable for delivering great performance at unbeatable power efficiency, the lower power consumption leads to reduced platform and cooling/operating costs, and the six memory channels still provide ample DDR5 memory bandwidth while lowering platform costs.