mascarilha
09-01-2007, 00:51
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 review´s
Review 1 :
http://aycu17.webshots.com/image/9216/2004551253412084220_rs.jpg (http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/v/2004551253412084220)
http://aycu17.webshots.com/image/10656/2004562292886273855_rs.jpg (http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/v/2004562292886273855)
http://aycu17.webshots.com/image/10656/2004594444444399625_rs.jpg (http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/v/2004594444444399625)
http://aycu31.webshots.com/image/10150/2004594960430561023_rs.jpg (http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/v/2004594960430561023)
http://aycu14.webshots.com/image/7373/2000274274160789393_rs.jpg (http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/v/2000274274160789393)
http://aycu23.webshots.com/image/6822/2000256307974018242_rs.jpg (http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/v/2000256307974018242)
Multi-tasked Gaming :
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/893/multiquake1600folx9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/8434/multifear1600foed3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Conclusion:
So is the Core 2 Quad Q6600 ready to take on the mainstream market?
Yes and no.
Hardware-wise, Intel’s Core 2 Quad Q6600 is primed for success. Because Intel’s quad-core processors are compatible with most of the Core 2-compliant 975X and P965 motherboards already on the market, the hardware infrastructure is already in place for the Core 2 Quad Q6600, it’s practically a drop-in replacement for most folks who already own one of these motherboards. All you’ll likely need is a BIOS update for Q6600 support. The processor itself is also a terrific performer, outpacing AMD’s 3.0GHz FX-74 4x4 system in many of our tests, although keep in mind that in apps that don’t take advantage of multi-threading (read: games), it performs similarly to a Core 2 Duo E6600.
The biggest obstacle that the Core 2 Quad Q6600 will have to overcome, at least in the short term, is pricing. As of right now, the CPU carries an $851 price tag. As we mentioned in the intro, that’s an awfully expensive price considering that for less than $150 more, you can get a Core 2 Extreme QX6700 which runs over 200MHz faster and more importantly, has an unlocked clock multiplier, allowing you to OC the CPU to your hearts content provided you’ve got the right motherboard.
The bottom line is that as it stands today, the Core 2 Quad Q6600 is priced too close to the Core 2 Extreme to really be a good value.
Review completa >>http://firingsquad.com/links/preloader.asp?return_url=/hardware/intel_core_quad_q6600_preview/default.asp
Review 2 :
Core 2 Quad Q6600: Four Cores for the Masses?
Review Completa>> http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2079567,00.asp
pelos vistos na 1 Review eles tiveram que usar um QX6700 com underclok em vez de um Q6600
Originally Posted by FiringSquad
For the Core 2 Quad Q6600 launch Intel isn’t providing CPU samples of the processor itself to press in advance, so we’re forced to lower the multiplier on our Core 2 Extreme QX6700 processor instead in order to obtain our benchmark results for this article. Performance between this underclocked QX6700 running at 2.4GHz and the real deal should be pretty similar, although obviously we can’t provide any indication on how well the CPU overclocks, as we don’t have a real sample to test with.
cumps
Review 1 :
http://aycu17.webshots.com/image/9216/2004551253412084220_rs.jpg (http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/v/2004551253412084220)
http://aycu17.webshots.com/image/10656/2004562292886273855_rs.jpg (http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/v/2004562292886273855)
http://aycu17.webshots.com/image/10656/2004594444444399625_rs.jpg (http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/v/2004594444444399625)
http://aycu31.webshots.com/image/10150/2004594960430561023_rs.jpg (http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/v/2004594960430561023)
http://aycu14.webshots.com/image/7373/2000274274160789393_rs.jpg (http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/v/2000274274160789393)
http://aycu23.webshots.com/image/6822/2000256307974018242_rs.jpg (http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/v/2000256307974018242)
Multi-tasked Gaming :
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/893/multiquake1600folx9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/8434/multifear1600foed3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Conclusion:
So is the Core 2 Quad Q6600 ready to take on the mainstream market?
Yes and no.
Hardware-wise, Intel’s Core 2 Quad Q6600 is primed for success. Because Intel’s quad-core processors are compatible with most of the Core 2-compliant 975X and P965 motherboards already on the market, the hardware infrastructure is already in place for the Core 2 Quad Q6600, it’s practically a drop-in replacement for most folks who already own one of these motherboards. All you’ll likely need is a BIOS update for Q6600 support. The processor itself is also a terrific performer, outpacing AMD’s 3.0GHz FX-74 4x4 system in many of our tests, although keep in mind that in apps that don’t take advantage of multi-threading (read: games), it performs similarly to a Core 2 Duo E6600.
The biggest obstacle that the Core 2 Quad Q6600 will have to overcome, at least in the short term, is pricing. As of right now, the CPU carries an $851 price tag. As we mentioned in the intro, that’s an awfully expensive price considering that for less than $150 more, you can get a Core 2 Extreme QX6700 which runs over 200MHz faster and more importantly, has an unlocked clock multiplier, allowing you to OC the CPU to your hearts content provided you’ve got the right motherboard.
The bottom line is that as it stands today, the Core 2 Quad Q6600 is priced too close to the Core 2 Extreme to really be a good value.
Review completa >>http://firingsquad.com/links/preloader.asp?return_url=/hardware/intel_core_quad_q6600_preview/default.asp
Review 2 :
Core 2 Quad Q6600: Four Cores for the Masses?
Review Completa>> http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2079567,00.asp
pelos vistos na 1 Review eles tiveram que usar um QX6700 com underclok em vez de um Q6600
Originally Posted by FiringSquad
For the Core 2 Quad Q6600 launch Intel isn’t providing CPU samples of the processor itself to press in advance, so we’re forced to lower the multiplier on our Core 2 Extreme QX6700 processor instead in order to obtain our benchmark results for this article. Performance between this underclocked QX6700 running at 2.4GHz and the real deal should be pretty similar, although obviously we can’t provide any indication on how well the CPU overclocks, as we don’t have a real sample to test with.
cumps